Waste Management provides waste collection, transfer, recycling and disposal services in North America. The company owns a number of landfill sites and landfill gas-to-energy facilities.
|Most recent||Growth rate (CAGR)|
|1 year||5 years||10 years|
|Book value of equity per share||$14.12||13.2%||0.3%||1.9%|
|BV including aggregate dividends||27.5%||9.8%||9.4%|
|1 year||5 years||10 years|
|Most recent||Growth rate (CAGR)|
|1 year||5 years||10 years|
|1 year||5 years||10 years|
A company creates wealth for its long-term shareholders in 2 main ways - through dividend payments and through the accumulation of retained earnings. This graph shows the accumulation of per-share equity of long-term shareholders (green bars), which consists of the retained earnings plus all capital invested in the company, and the cumulative dividends the company has paid over time per share of its stock (blue bars).
In the words of Warren Buffett: "We're looking for... businesses earning good returns on equity while employing little or no debt."
Return on equity is a key metric of financial performance, indicating a company's ability to generate earnings using shareholder capital. Over time, ROE is one of the major determinants of the rate at which a company creates shareholder wealth. The average ROE for large U.S. companies is 12%, and many investors use it as a threshold for attractive investments.
Companies can boost ROE by increasing leverage, which reduces the safety of the investment. Therefore, it is useful to look at the return on assets (ROA), which measures a company's earning power regardless of its capital structure. A widening gap between ROE and ROA may be a warning sign that should be thoroughly investigated.
Earnings per share is a popular metric used to value a company (using P/E ratio); growth in EPS is often used to judge company growth potential. However, many investors believe that EPS is an inferior metric to ROE, because it ignores the amount of capital the company used to generate earnings.
Free cash flow shows how much cash a company generates from operations, above and beyond what is required to maintain or expand its productive assets. This cash can be returned to investors, or spent by management on growing the company or paying back its debts.
Balance sheets of many companies contain intangible assets such as goodwill, trademarks, patents, etc. Many investors consider intangibles more difficult to value than physical assets. If intangible assets had been valued incorrectly, they must be impaired, resulting in a loss charged against shareholder equity. This chart demonstrates the potential loss to shareholder equity from such impairments.
Companies often use debt financing to increase their return on equity. However, as the amount of debt financing increases relative to the amount of equity financing, the company becomes more sensitive to down turns and other negative events. As a result, many investors use the ratio of debt to equity as a measure of a company's financial risk, and avoid companies that have this ratio above 1.
This chart shows shareholder equity as a percentage of total assets, allowing investors to judge the overall leverage. Companies with a higher proportion of equity can be viewed as safer investments. This metric is particularly important for highly leveraged institutions, such as banks, where it must be at least 4% according to government regulations.
The ratio of current assets to current liabilities is known as the current ratio. This metric is a quick measure of the company's ability to pay its short-term obligations. A current ratio below 1 is a warning sign that should be investigated, especially for companies that cannot count on adequate cash flow from operations.
This chart shows the cumulative dilution of investor ownership in a company over time. Dilution reduces an investor's participation in the future earnings. Dilution increases when a company issues new shares, and decreases when a company buys its shares back. Many investors avoid companies with large chronic dilution.
analysis provides insight into factors affecting the Return On Equity of a company.
The DuPont equation decomposes ROE as follows:
ROE = (Net margin) * (Asset turnover) * (Asset to equity ratio)
Net margin indicates operating efficiency, Asset turnover measures the total asset use efficiency, and the Asset to equity ratio is a measure of financial leverage.
The dividend payout ratio tells investors what percentage of earnings a company returns to shareholders, and what percentage it retains and reinvests. This ratio represents a major capital allocation decision by the company, and can be used to judge management rationality. Rational management should pay out all earnings that cannot be productively reinvested. Therefore, a low dividend payout ratio for a profitable company with a low growth potential may be a warning sign.
Many investors use the P/B ratio as a quick way of judging company valuation. Value investors - followers of Graham and Dodd - specifically seek out companies with low P/B ratios. However, investors should be careful not to make investment decisions on this metric alone, without considering a company's earning and growth potential, since a low P/B ratio can be a sign of a bleak future for the business.
P/E ratio is a popular way of making a quick judgment of a company valuation. Value investors - followers of Graham and Dodd - often seek solid companies with low P/E ratios as investment opportunities. However, P/E ratio represents an oversimplified approach to business valuation, and can often lead to incorrect investment decisions.
On June 30, 1995, the Company completed its merger with Chambers and approximately 27,900,000 shares of the Company's common stock were issued in exchange for all outstanding shares of Chambers Common Stock and Class A Common Stock. The transaction has been accounted for using the pooling of interests method of accounting, and accordingly, the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Chambers for all periods presented.
On October 6, 1995, the Company completed a public offering of 6,345,625 shares of its common stock, priced at $19.625 per share. The net proceeds of approximately $118,000,000 were primarily used for the repayment of debt. Approximately 75% of the proceeds were applied to the revolving credit facility and can be redrawn as the Company's needs dictate for use in the expansion of its business, including acquisitions.
On May 7, 1996, the Company consummated an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the "Merger Agreement") to acquire Western through a merger transaction ("Western Merger") accounted for as a pooling of interests and, accordingly, the accompanying financial information has been restated to include the accounts and operations of Western for all periods presented. Under the terms of the Merger Agreement, the Company issued 1.50 shares of its common stock for each share of Western outstanding common stock. Prior to the Western Merger, the Company owned approximately 4.1% of Western's outstanding shares (634,900 common shares), which were canceled on the Western Merger's effective date. The Western Merger increased the Company's outstanding shares of common stock by approximately 22,028,000 shares and the Company assumed options under Western's stock option plans equivalent to approximately 5,200,000 underlying Company shares of common stock.
On May 15, 1996, the Company consummated a merger agreement with Grand Central, accounted for as a pooling of interests, pursuant to which the Company issued 2,067,605 shares of its common stock in exchange for all outstanding shares of Grand Central.
On August 30, 1996, the Company consummated a merger agreement with Sanifill (the "Sanifill Merger") accounted for as a pooling of interests and, accordingly, the accompanying financial information has been restated to include the accounts and operations of Sanifill for all periods presented. Under the terms of the Sanifill Merger, the Company issued 1.70 shares of its common stock for each share of Sanifill outstanding common stock. The Sanifill Merger increased the Company's outstanding shares of common stock by approximately 43,414,000 shares and the Company assumed options under Sanifill's stock option plans equivalent to approximately 4,361,000 underlying shares of Company common stock. In the third quarter of 1996, the Company recognized approximately $80,000,000 in merger related costs associated with the Sanifill Merger.
On February 7, 1997, concurrent with the Notes Offering, the Company completed a public offering of 11,500,000 shares of its common stock, priced at $35.125 per share. The net proceeds of approximately $387,438,000 were primarily used to repay debt under the Company's Credit Facility and for general corporate purposes.
On March 12, 1997, the Company acquired all of the Canadian solid waste subsidiaries of Allied Waste Industries, Inc., representing 41 collection businesses, seven landfills, and eight transfer stations in the provinces of Alberta, British Columbia, Manitoba, Ontario, Quebec, and Saskatchewan, for approximately $518,000,000 in cash. In connection with the transaction, the Company's Canadian subsidiary borrowed $350,000,000, as evidenced by a promissory note bearing interest at Banker's Acceptance plus 0.45%. The Company currently intends to repay the $350,000,000 Canadian borrowings with proceeds from its domestic credit facility prior to June 30, 1997. Reducing the availability for this anticipated use, the Company has approximately $824,000,000 available for additional cash borrowings under its credit facility as of March 27, 1997.
On August 26, 1997, the Company consummated a merger agreement with United (the "United Merger") accounted for as a pooling of interests and, accordingly, the accompanying financial statements have been restated to include the accounts and operations of United for all prior periods presented. Under the terms of the United Merger, the Company issued 1.075 shares of its common stock for each share of United outstanding common stock. Additionally, at the effective date of the United Merger, all United stock options, whether or not such stock options had vested or had become exercisable, were cancelled in exchange for the Company's common stock equal in market value to the fair value of such United stock options, as determined by an independent third party. The United Merger increased the Company's outstanding shares of common stock by approximately 51,900,000 shares, which includes approximately 1,900,000 shares exchanged for the aforementioned United stock options. In the third quarter of 1997, the Company incurred approximately $89,152,000 in merger related costs associated with the United Merger.
On January 14, 1998, the Company acquired the solid waste divisions of City Management Holdings Trust ("City Management") for approximately $810,000,000 consisting of cash paid, and liabilities and debt assumed. The businesses acquired are primarily located in the state of Michigan and include several collection operations, landfills, and transfer stations. This acquisition was accounted for using the purchase method of accounting.
On July 16, 1998, the Company consummated the Merger with WM Holdings (formerly Waste Management, Inc.) accounted for as a pooling of interests. Under the terms of the agreement, the Company issued 0.725 of a share of its common stock for each outstanding share of WM Holdings common stock. The Merger increased the Company's outstanding shares of common stock by approximately 354,000,000 shares. The Combined Company is a leading international provider of waste management and related services to governmental, residential, commercial and industrial customers in the United States and selected international markets.